pdf Determinants of Motor Vehicle Taxpayer Compliance: Trust, Tax Sanctions, and Service Quality
Keywords:
Taxpayer Compliance; , Service Quality; , Trust; , Tax SanctionsAbstract
Research Objectives - This study aims to examine the effects of service quality, trust, and tax sanctions on motor vehicle taxpayer compliance.
Method - This study employs a quantitative approach using a survey method through the distribution of questionnaires to motor vehicle taxpayers. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine the relationships among the research variables.
Research Findings - The results indicate that service quality does not have a significant effect on motor vehicle taxpayer compliance. In contrast, trust in tax authorities has a positive and significant effect on taxpayer compliance. Furthermore, the implementation of strict tax sanctions has been proven to enhance motor vehicle taxpayers’ compliance in fulfilling their tax obligations.
Theory and Practical Implications - Hasil penelitian ini memperkuat perspektif teori kepatuhan pajak yang menekankan pentingnya kepercayaan dan mekanisme sanksi dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak. Pemerintah daerah diharapkan dapat meningkatkan transparansi dan konsistensi penegakan sanksi untuk memperkuat kepatuhan wajib pajak kendaraan bermotor.
Novelty - Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam konteks pajak kendaraan bermotor, faktor kepercayaan dan sanksi pajak lebih menentukan kepatuhan wajib pajak dibandingkan kualitas pelayanan administrasi.
Downloads
References
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.
Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2011). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 635–651.
Alm, J., McClelland, G., & Schulze, W. (2012). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48(1), 21–38.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dahlan, H., Pakila, R. B., Aida, N., & Tenrigau, A. M. (2025). Harvesting tax benefits from fixed asset revaluation in state-owned enterprises. Journal of Economic and Social Science, 2(2), 216–223. https://andipandangaijournal.com/index.php/JoESS/article/view/45/53
Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax authorities’ interaction with taxpayers: A conception of compliance in social dilemmas by power and trust. New Ideas in Psychology, 37, 13–23.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The slippery slope framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dahniyar Daud (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.