pdf Tawhidic Ecology in the Qur'an as a Solution to the Environmental Crisis

Authors

  • Irwan Zahedi Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Author
  • Rosmini Amin Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Author
  • Hasyim Haddade Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar Author

Keywords:

Tawhidic Ecology; , Qur’an; , Environmental Crisis; , Mizan; , Khalifah

Abstract

Research Objectives - This study aims to analyze the Qur’anic perspective on the environment and identify ecological principles that can be applied as solutions to contemporary environmental crises.

Method - This study employs a qualitative approach using a library research design. Data were analyzed through content analysis integrated with the thematic exegesis (tafsir maudhu‘i) method of Qur’anic verses related to environmental issues.

Research Findings - The findings reveal that environmental degradation (al-fasad) is viewed by the Qur’an as a consequence of human behavior that deviates from divine values and ecological responsibility. The concept of mizan emphasizes the importance of maintaining ecological balance as the foundation of sustainable life. Meanwhile, the concept of khalifah positions human beings as trustees responsible for environmental stewardship through responsible consumption, resource conservation, and biodiversity protection.

Theory and Practical Implications - These findings strengthen the theocentric perspective in environmental studies by positioning environmental preservation as an expression of devotion to Allah SWT. Environmental policies should integrate spiritual values, ecological ethics, and sustainable development principles.

Novelty - This study integrates the concepts of al-fasad, mizan, and khalifah into a unified paradigm of Tawhidic Ecology, explaining the interrelationship among environmental degradation, ecological balance, and human responsibility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. (2001). Fikih lingkungan: Panduan menjaga alam dalam Islam. Upaya Press.

Abdullah, M. (2017). Islamic environmental ethics, law, and society. Arab Law Quarterly, 31(4), 361–383.

Al-Qardhawi, Y. (2002). Islam agama ramah lingkungan. Pustaka Al-Kautsar.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Departemen Agama RI. (2019). Al-Qur'an dan terjemahannya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur'an.

Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Seto, K. C., & Österblom, H. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50(4), 834–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8

Foltz, R. C., Denny, F. M., & Baharuddin, A. (Eds.). (2003). Islam and ecology: A bestowed trust. Harvard University Press.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Mangunjaya, F. M. (2005). Konservasi alam dalam Islam. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mangunjaya, F. M. (2010). Ekosistem Islam. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mangunjaya, F. M., & McKay, J. E. (2012). Reviving an Islamic approach for environmental conservation in Indonesia. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 16(3), 286–305.

Nasr, S. H. (1997). Man and nature: The spiritual crisis of modern man. ABC International Group.

Rahman, F. (1982). Major themes of the Qur'an. University of Chicago Press.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002a). Membumikan Al-Qur'an: Fungsi dan peran wahyu dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Mizan.

Shihab, M. Q. (2002b). Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, kesan dan keserasian Al-Qur'an. Lentera Hati.

Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30