pdf Determinant Factors in Education
Keywords:
Determinant Factors, Systemic Relations , Educational Quality, Holistic EducationAbstract
Research Objectives - This study aims to analyze the systemic relationships among determinant factors in education in improving the quality of learning and fostering human development.
Method - This research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data analysis was conducted through thematic analysis, encompassing transcription, coding, categorization, and interactive interpretation of themes.
Research Findings - The findings indicate that educational quality is determined by holistic relationships among educators, learners, educational objectives, educational instruments, and the educational environment. Dialogical interactions between teachers and learners strengthen learning motivation and value internalization. In addition, the utilization of technology demonstrates adaptive partial relations; however, its effectiveness remains dependent on systemic support from the social and institutional environment.
Theory and Practical Implications - Theoretically, these findings affirm the importance of an open-systems approach in understanding educational determinants. From a policy perspective, collaborative and integrative strategies among stakeholders are required to build a sustainable educational ecosystem.
Novelty - The novelty of this study lies in the conceptual formulation of holistic and partial relations as an integrative analytical model for explaining the determinants of education.
Downloads
References
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill.
Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. (2010). Desain induk pendidikan karakter. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 750–782.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Indo Uleng, Yuspiani, Saprin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
